johnny come lately.
Don’t judge me. But I finally found the time to watch this:
Y’all didn’t tell me. Well, maybe you did. Was I paying attention? Perhaps not. What you should have done was anchor my ass to a chair and put the screen directly in front of me.
Understand, I got books to read, lesson plans to write, photos to edit, essays to write, an online journal to edit, all of Season 4 of Mad Men to catch up on… but still, this may have been a priority bit to watch. But that shit is dope. I dig the song, but you know, this girl loves aesthetics and narrative. Like, how we’ve taken key pieces of style (fashion, music) from the last century during uncertain and tumultuous times (WWII and 60s) and mirror them now. We’re searching for a cultural expression for these times… and it’s a pastiche, collage with our post, post modern technology and sensibilities. You may not feel me on this yet. I’ll come back and unpack it for you. I promise.
bookmarks. labor day edition.
A hit list of stuff on the interwebs holding my attention for the time being:
These guys from McNally Jackson Booksellers go-in about Frazen’s Freedom. If you’re in the literary/publishing world, you may be over hearing about it. But this exchange is hilarious and insightful.
In another -freude, TAP’s Jamelle Bouie has made war with Kos in his review of American Taliban. It sort of seems like a generational battle baby boomers versus the next generation (X and millenials), but maybe not. But I think it’s healthy to agree to disagree here. I also believe in precision in language. I gotta side with Team Bouie on this one. I see no good in conflating political realities of the Taliban and authoritarianism with our version of democracy. I don’t feel that in the language of drawing parallels between the two regimes serves any useful purpose except promoting a limited point of view of Islam as well as accepting the terms of the conservative movement’s framing and shaping of domestic policy through the prism of a clash of civilizations. I respect a lot of things from Daily Kos and certainly Digby (reading them both as far back as 2003/4). Yet, I have to wonder how much rhetoric inflames the progressive/left base to move towards meaningful action? I want to regain balance too as evidenced by my obsession with our American narrative, but I don’t think using the opponents’ language in persuading the left, center or independents will do a greater good.
Another book I’ll likely read before I read American Taliban or Freedom, is this chronicling of the Great Migration. Read more…
‘who is this america dem speak of today?’ cont.
Russell Banks says so much more eloquently than I but below is a highlight:
After long reflection, I’ve come to believe that the single defining, likened sequence of stories that all Americans, north, south, and meso- share, regardless of our racial characteristics or ethnic cultural backgrounds, the one narrative that we all participate in, is that of the African Diaspora. This I the narrative template against which all others can be measured, fit into, laid over, or veneered onto. It doesn’t matter where in time one enters it –as Faulkner said, “the past isn’t dead, it isn’t even past –or from whose point of view it’s told. For we have all played different roles in that long serpentine story, and depending on our racial characteristics, sometimes we have been victim, sometimes victimizer, sometimes merely horrified, or thrilled, onlooker with something important, and self defining to lose or gain in the outcome. It doesn’t matter where it’s located. Surely by now we know that there is no town, no county, no state in America that has not been profoundly affected by the events, characters, themes and values dramatized by the story of race in America. It opens in the early seventeenth century, and it continues today in all the Americas, an in Europe too, as a late chapter in the Tale of Empire and in Asia as that chapter called the Vietnam War; and in Africa itself, in the chapters that describe and Liberia’s and Sierra Leone’s tragic, ongoing civil wars for instance. And you don’t have to be a prophet to see that, if this is indeed the era of the American Empire, the African Diaspora is a tale with chapters that will be set worldwide, whenever there is an American presence, well into the next century as well. I might go even further and say that if American culture, from McDonald’s to Disney to Nike, in all its subtle and not so subtle manifestations, has come to dominate the New World Order and if there is today no truly creolized society left on this earth—that is, no multiracial society in which power is not dispensed according to its citizens’ racial characteristics—then we might be able to speak of the universality of the African Diaspora as origin-myth. At least for the foreseeable future.
In its essential outline, it’s the story that begins in violence with capture, permanent enslavement, and forced migrations, passes into institutionalized racism and through emancipation rises to a first and false climax, where it undergoes sudden reversals and embittered transformation, withdraws like a wave falling back to gather force and new complexity, and leads eventually in our time to a future vision not of assimilation but of creolization—a strictly American vision in whose light we are led not to the denial of racial difference or to the celebration of either but to a vivid image of its eventual elimination as a means of group identification. Central to that story—the dialectical engine, one might say that drives its plot—is the conflict between the crime of slavery at the beginning and the morality expressed in our sacred documents, the Bill of Rights and the Constitutions; so that ultimately for the conflict to be resolved in favor of that morality (as it must, if we are not to be a nation of criminals) race in America will be seen to have been all along nothing but a social construct. It will be no longer possible to describe a child in racial terms. To say that a child’s skin is ‘black’ or ‘white’ or ‘red’ or ‘yellow’ will be to day noting socially meaningful about him or her. We will have become a true democracy at last, and, who knows, perhaps we can begin then to talk coherently and openly about economics and class. Read more…
‘who is this america dem speak of today?’
‘Either I’m nobody, or I’m a nation.’ - Derek Walcott
My partner in crime and literati madness, Lynne, and I continued this conversation about America, American identity, narratives, and plurality over the weekend. I summarized my recent post for her at our stomping ground while we were planning the next issue of our literary journal. We both remarked how we willfully ignored the kerfuffle or hullabaloo of Glen Beck’s “Restoring Honor” rally in DC over the weekend. A rally so blatant in its effort to re-write the narrative of post-civil rights America to serve some nameless corporate and political interest that it turns stomachs, rolls eyes. Whatever. That spectacle, compounded by the nativism and islamophobia washing over many parts of the country over the Park 51 cultural center, juxtaposed against the intensity of the anti-immigration debate in Arizona and California, exacerbates the polarization. We shared our fury over two separate events of assault and vandalism directed at our Muslim Americans; I told her how some believe that this backlash was a delayed reaction to September 11th. We also talked about how we were worried after the towers fell that we would see this behavior in our community and didn’t. We remarked how our mongrel society in the County of Kings asserts our right to exist. Then, I brought her up to speed on the #frazenfreude, the crowning of author Jonathan Franzen as the Great American Novelist of our time, and it’s subsequent fallout/criticism from women authors (Jodi Piccoult, Jennifer Weiner, progenitors of the much maligned chick lit) and the Paris Review’s Lorin Stein’s thoughtful response over on Ta-Nehisi Coates’ blog on the Atlantic.
It’s impossible for me to not look at these things in relation to each other. The narrative of the American experience is undergoing some deep structural work. It’s good to see this debate out there in ether, warts and all. We’re all looking at this in different ways. Read more…
‘you used to be alright. what happened?’

(saunters in…takes earbuds out ears) Oh, Hey. Wassup??
So I’ve neglected my favorite space for a grip. Sorry about that. I think I needed more time and space to unpack the assault of information, misinformation, opinion, rss feeds, tweets, status updates, check-ins, mayorships, blogs, rants, compounded by some of the banality of daily living. So what’s going on? What did I miss? What happened this summer? Did you see Inception too?
Oh wait:
“NAACP delegates passed a resolution to condemn extremist elements within the Tea Party, calling on Tea Party leaders to repudiate those in their ranks who use racist language in their signs and speeches.”
And magically, a scandal surfaced and someone had to respond to it:
[T]he national meeting of the NAACP issued a statement calling on the conservative Tea Party movement to “repudiate racist factions” in their midst, one year after many in the media and blogosphere had already pointed out evidence of racism during the health care reform protests. Then NAACP President Benjamin Jealous said they were “snookered” by a video posted by right-wing blogger Andrew Breitbart that purported to show civil rights veteran and USDA official Shirley Sherrod “revealing her past racism.” Sherrod was really telling a story about her own transformation, from a person who wanted to aid poor black farmers, to a person who wanted to assist poor farmers no matter their race. The NAACP of today should be celebrating the work of people like Sherrod, not misunderstanding who she is.
Rachel Maddow also flagged a pattern:
It all seems to be spinning out of control. The center will not hold.
it is what it is.
There’s a lot to talk about these days. The nightmare in the Gulf has consumed a lot of real estate in my brain. So while I was catching up on the state of world and American affairs, a recent New York Times article flagged a neglected aspect in our national discourse on our withdrawal from Iraq.
The American reconstruction authorities decided, however, that the first big rebuilding project to win hearts and minds would be a citywide sewage treatment system.
Now, after more than six years of work, $104 million spent, and without having connected a single house, American reconstruction officials have decided to leave the troubled system only partly finished, infuriating many city residents.
Additionally, The Prospect’s Courtney Martin raised another valid point:
Iraqi citizens shouldn’t be the only ones infuriated by our military’s half-assed effort to rebuild a nation that we so righteously destroyed not so long ago. Americans should also be outraged. We should be fuming. This war was fought in our names, and now shoddy infrastructure and broken promises will be our legacy. We should be calling our political representatives and demanding that the U.S. military finish what it started in Iraq and implement a long-term plan for incorporating nation-building practices effectively and ethically.
Still, I can’t help but weigh some critical path items that have prevented completion of these projects. Money isn’t everything. And yes, we should be upset about all of our over leveraged assets (personnel, lives, tax dollars) engaged in an ongoing effort that many of us questioned from its inception, but is anyone that surprised? Who recalls the details of a reconstruction and rebuilding plan once regime change occurred and the nation was secure? Our overstretched military reduced troop presence in Afghanistan, while operating in a universe where they’ve had next to no civilian support. Their job? Secure the nation, defeat insurgents, protect the lives of Iraqi people and themselves, rebuild roads, build water/sewer treatment facilities, build/replace power grid, rebuild housing, train local militia, protect rising political leaders, deactivate IUDs, build checkpoints, conduct night patrols, repair and promote America’s image… During the Bush years, as we’ve all come to learn, the State Department was crippled by lack of funding and staff. That civilian force was critical in working with the Iraqis to build capacity to manage their local and national governments. And since Obama’s taken office, we’re slowly seeing a reversal of that stance, only to be stymied by Republican opposition in appointments. Whereas the Bush Administration’s tact to rebuilding Iraq was blind faith in the efficiency of the military and the holy competency of private corporations. Read more…
yahrzeit. susan ponce de leon.
on independence.
While some grill meats, unite with families, picnic with friends and drink beer, and others question identity, question what is American, blindly quote words of our founding fathers and reflect on wise yet provocative and controversial words from one of our greatest thinkers of our shared history, I turn to one of the greatest collaborations in American history. May I present the divine Sarah Vaughn and the delightful George Gershwin.

